In the wake of Thursday’s demonstrations urging the swift election of the Attorney, what initially appeared as a civic call for attention has taken a darker turn toward hostility.
Undoubtedly, the right to protest is a cornerstone of democracy, a genuine avenue for citizens to voice their concerns. Criticizing this fundamental right, as some are inclined to do in the aftermath of the extended lockdown experienced not only by magistrates but also by the entire staff and visitors of the Palace of Justice, demonstrates a misunderstanding of the democratic process. To question this right is to entertain the notion that certain voices should remain unheard, an unacceptable proposition.
It is essential to draw a clear distinction between peaceful protest and outright aggression. While raising one’s voice to be heard is emblematic of democracy, employing intimidation tactics to enforce one’s will constitutes a criminal act.
Yesterday, just before the announcement of the election results for the Attorney, disturbing comments surfaced on social media. Statements such as “magistrates must bend to the will of the people,” “the so-called ‘narco court’ must submit to the people’s mandate,” or “let Petro dismantle the Court” reveal a perilous lack of respect for an institution that represents one of society’s most significant, albeit imperfect, achievements over the centuries. The same society that currently has Gustavo Petro as its president only seems to fully appreciate its democracy when faced with its potential loss, echoing scenarios seen in Venezuela, Nicaragua, or Russia. The paradox lies in the fact that “the people” sometimes possess a genuine mandate, while at other times, they are subject to manipulation, pursuing justice through means contradictory to their intended end.
The clumsiness displayed by those attempting to seize the Palace of Justice is immeasurable, as is the lack of foresight in trying to confine magistrates within the building. However, the primary responsibility rests with those comfortably situated in their offices, fanning the flames by inciting the “people” against democratic institutions.
Undeniably, there are systemic issues in Colombia that demand attention and reform. The political class, driven by a pursuit of wealth and power, has become a cancer that abandoned its electorate to align with the darkest elements of society. However, in the pursuit of positive change, it is imperative not to descend to their level or commit acts that contradict the values we seek to uphold. Gratuitous aggression and blackmail have no place in steering Colombia toward a future where the majority can lead dignified lives.
Thursday witnessed protests, which, in essence, should be understood as a call to action. However, the transformative potential of this message was extinguished as it morphed into aggression and intimidation. The quest for justice for some became the catalyst for criminal actions by others. Unless “the people” have collectively decided to embody what they vehemently criticize, the events of yesterday remain unjustifiable.
